The contrast between stop n steps last two YouTube videos see

[Jonnyjonjon]

Anyone have a look at stop n steps last two vids, and tell me the first isn't affiliate casino bullshit money, and the second vid when he is collecting the Goonies bottom feature and not going mad with the pie gambles is obviously his own? He tells me it's all his cash, but I beg to diffa. Just watch it's there to see. Now tell me when he's doing those pie gambles on the first vid, that it's not incredibly mis leading and irresponsible. I don't care how much he gets payed to creep around amusement arcades and bookmakers, that has got to be the most dangerous thing I have seen a UK streamer post to date and I don't see how people can argue against it. Other streamers I ask you with blatant videos side by side like that, isn't he going to bring heat on the rest of your scene. I ain't a hater persay, just a hater of dangerous bullshit. I beg you viewers DONT BELIEVE THE HYPE! ( OR AT LEAST CONSUME WITH MORE SALT THAN CAPTAIN BIRDSEYES TITS! ) BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM😂🤣😭🤔

[Chloe]

I haven't watched either of the videos, but it's a dangerous precedent to set that how much of it is your own money is determined by the gambles you're willing to take. I've seen times that Will has lost 10+ gambles in a row on CherryPop, and other times he'll collect straight away. I guess it depends what the aim of the video is, how much you're behind, or what content you're trying to produce. I know Stop and Step is well known as someone who risks the pie gambles in the bookies, so this is probably the content people expect from him - his videos probably wouldn't do as well if he just played FOBTs without the gambles. But no, it shouldn't be replicated. Neither should a lot of the content available online, though.

[Jonnyjonjon]

Just cus there's other bad stuff on the net, like stated, don't make it right. Please watch the content and have a look. If you know what his videos are usually like aswell, the contrast is stark. For him just to suddenly put in a  pie gamble for around £30 being gambled all the way up to spins with the value of £1000, with no indication of cost, or the amount of loosing gambles that would have taken and put out the content for anyone to be completely mis led by is wrong on every level and can't be defended in my book, please ask Will to get back to me on this I would love to know his view. Thanks for reply